Async coding interviews that don't burn your senior engineers' time
Keep the signal, lose the scheduling. Probe runs realistic coding tasks asynchronously and returns an evidence-cited scorecard in minutes — so your seniors review on their schedule, not in real time.
The real cost of a live technical loop isn't the candidate's hour — it's your staff engineer's hour, pulled off a launch to watch someone code in real time. Across every candidate and every round, live interviewing is a tax on exactly the people you can least afford to tax.
Async is the obvious fix. Teams have resisted it only because async has historically meant take-home — slow, gameable, and invisible. Probe fixes that.
What async, done right, requires
- Process capture. A submitted repo tells you nothing about how it was made. Probe records the event stream — edits, prompts, test runs — so you can see judgment, not just output.
- Fast, trustworthy scoring. If a human still reads every submission start to finish, you haven't removed the senior-time tax. The silent watcher grades each session against your rubric and produces a scorecard in minutes.
- Consistency. Same task, same environment, same rubric for every candidate — none of the interviewer-had-a-bad-day variance that live loops carry.
The result
Candidates open a link and work on their own schedule — no installs, no account, no scheduling. Your team opens the scorecard when it's convenient, reads the cited moments, and either trusts the recommendation or overrides it with one click. The signal survives; the calendar bottleneck disappears. Read the deeper argument in async coding interviews that don't burn senior time, or see the AI-native interview overview.
Common questions
Isn't an async coding interview just a take-home?
No. A take-home gives you a finished repo with no visibility into how it was made and still requires a human to read every submission. Probe captures the full process — edits, prompts, test runs — and grades it automatically against your rubric, returning a scorecard in minutes. You get async convenience without the take-home's blind spots.
How does async scoring stay trustworthy?
A silent watcher AI grades every session against the dimensions you define, and every score cites a specific transcript moment. Because the same rubric and environment apply to every candidate, you also remove the interviewer-to-interviewer variance that live loops introduce.
How much senior-engineer time does this save?
A live technical round typically costs a senior engineer 60–90 minutes including prep and writeup. Async, automated scoring replaces that with reviewing the scorecards worth a closer look — often a few minutes each — freeing your most expensive people from sitting in real-time interviews.
Can candidates still be asked to explain their work?
Yes. An optional voice debrief lets the candidate walk through what they built and why, giving you the defend-your-decisions signal without a scheduled live panel.
Run your first AI-native interview this week.
Set up in under five minutes. No installs for candidates.
Get started